2025 Comparison Guide

Antigravity vs Cursor vs Windsurf

Which AI-powered IDE is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and performance.

Quick Comparison

Feature
AntigravityFree
Cursor$20/month
Windsurf$15/month
Autonomous Agents
Multi-Agent Orchestration~
Browser Automation
Context Window1M+ tokens200K tokens128K tokens
Artifact Generation~
VS Code Compatibility
Multi-Model Support
PriceFree$20/month$15/month

✓ = Full support | ~ = Partial/Limited | ✗ = Not available

Core Philosophy

Different approaches to AI-assisted development

Antigravity

Agent-First Automation

Treats AI agents as first-class citizens. Agents autonomously plan, execute, and verify complex development tasks across editor, terminal, and browser.

Best for:

Full automation, large codebases, rapid prototyping

Cursor

AI-Augmented Editing

Enhances manual coding with AI predictions and suggestions. Developer remains in full control while AI accelerates common tasks.

Best for:

Precise editing, strict conventions, daily coding

Windsurf

Flow-Based Development

Focuses on developer flow with contextual AI assistance. Cascade feature provides step-by-step guidance through complex tasks.

Best for:

Learning, guided development, smaller projects

Antigravity vs Cursor: Deep Dive

Antigravity Advantages

  • Completely Free

    No subscription fees, no usage limits during public preview

  • 1M+ Token Context

    Gemini 3 handles entire monorepos without truncation

  • Full Autonomy

    Agents work independently across editor, terminal, and browser

  • Artifact Verification

    Screenshots, plans, and recordings for trust and verification

Cursor Advantages

  • Mature Ecosystem

    Longer track record with enterprise-grade stability

  • Composer Model

    Proprietary AI model optimized specifically for coding

  • Developer Control

    AI assists but developer maintains full control

  • Fast Completions

    ~30 second average task completion time

Performance Benchmarks

Real-world performance comparison

SWE-bench Verified

Antigravity76.2%
Cursor68.5%
Windsurf52.3%

Feature Development Speed

Antigravity42s avg
Cursor68s avg
Windsurf85s avg

*Next.js + Supabase backend feature development

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Antigravity If...

  • You want maximum automation
  • Working with large codebases
  • Need rapid prototyping
  • Budget-conscious
  • Want browser automation

Choose Cursor If...

  • Prefer manual control
  • Need strict code conventions
  • Daily coding tasks
  • Enterprise environment
  • Existing VS Code user

Choose Windsurf If...

  • Learning to code
  • Want guided development
  • Working on smaller projects
  • Prefer step-by-step flow
  • Budget alternative to Cursor

Try Antigravity Free

Experience the power of agent-first development at no cost.

No credit card required • Windows, macOS, Linux